TGRN

TurnOnGreen, Inc.
2 filings tracked
technologycloud computingMICRO (<$300M)

Company Intelligence Hub

Filing history, signal momentum, and bull/bear evolution

Chronological Filing Evolution (Click to filter / toggle)

Thesis (Bull Case Evolution)

TurnOnGreen is demonstrating a decisive strategic pivot toward the high-growth electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure market. The company's Q1 2026 results highlight a significant shift in revenue quality, with EV charger sales surging 72% year-over-year to $549,000.…

Bullish Outlook

Antithesis (Bear Case / Structural Risks)

Despite the narrative of an EV inflection point, TurnOnGreen's financial foundation is precarious.…

Risk Factors

Read the full bull/bear analysis

You are reading the free preview. Start a free trial to unlock the complete bull & bear analysis for every TGRN filing.

Start Free Trial

Synthesis (Verdict & Resolution)

The Q1 2026 filing presents a company at a crossroads, where promising product-market fit in the EV sector is clashing with a dire financial reality. While the 72% growth in EV charger revenue and the expansion into international markets provide a glimmer of operational success, these gains are overshadowed by a balance sheet characterized by massive liabilities and a critical lack of cash. The company is essentially operating as a venture project funded by related-party debt. For investors, the central tension is whether the acceleration in EV adoption and the rollout of ultra-fast charging technology can scale fast enough to outpace the company's burn rate and debt obligations. The admission of material weaknesses in financial controls adds a layer of risk to the reported numbers, making the path to stability dependent on either a massive equity infusion or a strategic acquisition. Until the company can prove it can generate positive cash flow from operations, the operational wins remain secondary to the existential liquidity risk.

Selected Quarter

Core Takeaway

The company is successfully transitioning its product mix toward EV infrastructure, but it is currently funding this pivot through high-interest debt and related-party advances while facing a liquidity crisis.

Investor Lens

The trade-off is between the high-growth potential of the EV pivot and the immediate risk of insolvency.

Watch Next

The ability to secure non-dilutive funding or achieve positive operating cash flow in the next quarter.

Signal Momentum Chart

Quarterly net bull/bear signal ratio. Click nodes to select a quarter.

BULLISH (+1.0)NEUTRAL (0.0)BEARISH (-1.0)-0.50Q2 '26 (10-Q)

Signal Timeline

Active Filters:Quarter: Q2 '26 (10-Q)
bearishMay 13

Operating loss widened by 51% YoY to $621,000 due to rising G&A and relocation costs.

margin compression
70%
neutralMay 13

Company is relying on related-party advances and convertible notes to fund ongoing operations.

capital raise
60%
bearishMay 13

Net loss increased by 43% YoY to $773,000 despite revenue growth.

earnings miss
80%
bearishMay 13

Operating loss widened by 51% YoY to $621,000 due to rising G&A and relocation costs.

margin compression
70%
neutralMay 13

Company is relying on related-party advances and convertible notes to fund ongoing operations.

capital raise
60%
bearishMay 13

Net loss increased by 43% YoY to $773,000 despite revenue growth.

earnings miss
80%

Filing History

10-QMay 13, 2026
Expand Sequence

The Q1 2026 filing presents a company at a crossroads, where promising product-market fit in the EV sector is clashing with a dire financial reality. While the 72% growth in EV charger revenue and the expansion into international markets provide a glimmer of operational success, these gains are overshadowed by a balance sheet characterized by massive liabilities and a critical lack of cash. The company is essentially operating as a venture project funded by related-party debt. For investors, the central tension is whether the acceleration in EV adoption and the rollout of ultra-fast charging technology can scale fast enough to outpace the company's burn rate and debt obligations. The admission of material weaknesses in financial controls adds a layer of risk to the reported numbers, making the path to stability dependent on either a massive equity infusion or a strategic acquisition. Until the company can prove it can generate positive cash flow from operations, the operational wins remain secondary to the existential liquidity risk.

Disclaimer: The synthesis provided is generated by AI models and should not be construed as investment advice. Analysis is based solely on regulatory data present at the time of publication. Consult a financial advisor for specific investment strategies.